Skip to content

Conversation

@1782935682
Copy link
Contributor

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

Fixes #9685

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 10, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 48.10%. Comparing base (2f89371) to head (fc02fcd).
⚠️ Report is 38 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...he/rocketmq/broker/processor/PopReviveService.java 50.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #9686      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      48.17%   48.10%   -0.07%     
- Complexity     12091    12103      +12     
=============================================
  Files           1313     1313              
  Lines          92839    92979     +140     
  Branches       11868    11875       +7     
=============================================
+ Hits           44721    44729       +8     
- Misses         42613    42725     +112     
- Partials        5505     5525      +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

msgInner.setStoreHost(brokerController.getStoreHost());
msgInner.setReconsumeTimes(messageExt.getReconsumeTimes() + 1);
msgInner.getProperties().putAll(messageExt.getProperties());
if (null == messageExt.getProperties().get(MessageConst.PROPERTY_RETRY_TOPIC)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

containsKey

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

改了

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement] Add PROPERTY_RETRY_TOPIC in pop retry message

3 participants